The logic that comes out of gun rights activists continually
puzzles me. After the horrific events at Newtown, NRA president Wayne
LaPierre infamously
blamed everything except the gun which was used to kill 26 innocent
children and teachers. He blamed
violence in video games, violence in the movies, and violence in music. The
violence in video
games has been particularly
targeted as of late by Republicans.
I find this curious, since so many “gun
rights” activists say that blaming guns for deaths is the same as blaming a
spoon for someone getting fat. Guns don’t cause violence, but a bunch of zeroes
and ones programmed to appear on a screen do??
Even more strange is that Republicans have recently
taken to accusing liberals of overlooking violence in video games and
media. Conservatives accuse President
Obama of giving
the video game industry a pass. Lawmakers
are assuming liberals don’t care about the violence portrayed in movies and
TV. What liberals are they actually
talking to? This must be more of the bulletproof logic (pardon the pun)that Daily Show correspondent John
Oliver noticed recently. Liberals
are almost entirely against violence. Who were the ones protesting the war in
Vietnam? Liberals. Who were the ones protesting the war in Iraq? Liberals.
I would self-identify as liberal and I detest violence to
the point where I would consider myself a pacifist. I know lots of liberals who are firmly against
violence. I listened to a liberal teen perform slam poetry in which she decried
the idea that shooting someone on a screen was somehow “okay,” while pointing
out that real-life has no “reset” button. My first semester in seminary, I took a class
on theological issues in films in which the professor mentioned he was unsure
about including a couple of movies that had significant violence such as The Passion of the Christ and Unforgiven. My ethics class this
semester has an entire section devoted to the problem of violence. Even today at church in “Sunday School”
someone mentioned the problem of violence in entertainment. So when I hear conservatives and Republicans
accusing liberals of not caring about violence in media, I have no idea what
they are talking about.
It’s not like all the gang-related shooting in Chicago were
from kids playing video games then going out an killing each other. Poor black kids can’t afford video game
systems; its upper middle-class white teens and young adults playing these
violent games—aka Republicans. So,
conservative lawmakers need to take a look in the mirror, and at their own
voting bloc.
I don't see you attacking Hilary Clinton or Bloomburg on their idea of blaming videogames on violence. I'm a Republican and I don't think that videogame causes violence (There have been very little as in VERY VERY LITTLE violence caused by video and those VERY FEW people were mentally unstable. I believe anybody who thinks video games cause violence is an idiot but hate how this article seems to point fingers only at Republicans.
ReplyDeleteDear anonymous,
ReplyDeleteThanks for reading and thanks for commenting. I would recommend you re-read this post. I recognize the problems of violence and media--my point was to point out the poor logic of blaming two dimensional objects in a screen yet not the three dimensional objects that are used to do the killing (aka guns).