Fast forward to present day and the so-called
“sequestration.” The sequester,
otherwise known as the Budget Control Act of 2011 was
authorized by a bipartisan committee as a trade-off for an increase in the
debt-ceiling. The deal was set up to
ensure the Republicans and Democrats could settle on some kind of deficit
reduction deal. To spur the two parties
to come to an agreement, this “sequester” was put in place, composed of cuts
that neither party would like, with the hope that the possibility of such cuts
would motivate the two to settle on a compromise deal. Well, to the surprise of
no one, no deal has been made as both sides were unable to come to an
agreement.
Now the
Republicans are accusing the President of “crying wolf” over the
impending budget cuts, and there’s plenty of mud-slinging both ways about who
is really at fault over this. Basically,
Dems are okay with some cuts but want to see revenues (taxes) increase as well,
while the GOP is completely opposed to any tax increases and will only go along
with budget cuts.
So what does this all have to do with Michelle
Malkin? Well, according to Colorado Senator Mark Udall, some of the budget cuts
that will happen because of the sequester is a “slashing of the number of
next-generation air tankers the U.S. Forest Service can acquire to supplement
its Korean War-era firefighting fleet” and “ Further cut the U.S. Forest Service's Wildland Fire Management
fund, which pays for hotshot crews and helping clear brush and fuel
from our forests.” So yeah, while Malkin was making a big deal about there not
being enough planes when her city was on fire, she’s suddenly silent—no,
actually making
light of the coming budget cuts.
The true "God" of the GOP |
Republicans
want to have it both ways, to cry out against “excessive spending” then make a
bid deal anytime budget cuts actually affect them. They want to have their cake
and eat it too. It’s about time
Americans starting calling them out for it.
**Update**
June 12, 2013, portions of Colorado are up in flames yet again, and where is Malkin? Blaming the government of course, saying nothing of the budget cuts she herself supported, ironically wondering why the government can't spend money any faster??
**Update**
June 12, 2013, portions of Colorado are up in flames yet again, and where is Malkin? Blaming the government of course, saying nothing of the budget cuts she herself supported, ironically wondering why the government can't spend money any faster??
No comments:
Post a Comment